View Single Post
Old 02-17-2017, 10:05 AM   #58
RMiller
Curio & Relic
Contributor
 
RMiller's Avatar
 
AKaholic #: 170327
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Illinois
Posts: 7,544
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aceshigh View Post
I agree ^ above that the Anderson ......I wouldn't buy their LPK's.

They make a very good mil-spec base of upper and lower receiver but that's as far as I would go with Anderson.
These lowers are the lowest cost, and meet the requirements which I haven't seen any particular reason to
spend 2-5x as much on in yielding any reasonable improvements anywhere

I spend more $$$ on the crucial parts like barrel, and BCG, and I always get Nickel Boron LPK's with improved combat trigger from Rguns.
Worst LPK experience I have ever had. Kicker is, it was going into an Anderson Lower.

I literally threw that POS away. The springs and that silver trigger group were awful. I went and bought a CMMG LPK and it went together no hassle.

There was a noticeable difference in quality.
__________________
Is it just me, or are the roots a little thirsty?



Join the GOA
RMiller is online now   Reply With Quote